Oh, Dearest Mother, Sweetest Virgin of Altagracia, our Patroness. You are our Advocate and to you we recommend our needs. You are our Teacher and like disciples we come to learn from the example of your holy life. You are our Mother, and like children, we come to offer you all of the love of our hearts. Receive, dearest Mother, our offerings and listen attentively to our supplications. Amen.



Active Topics || Favorites || Member List || Search || About Us || Help || Register || Login
Across Time and Place
 4Real Forums : Across Time and Place
Subject Topic: History for 1st grader? Post ReplyPost New Topic
Author
Message << Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
domchurch3
Forum Pro
Forum Pro


Joined: July 12 2007
Location: Texas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 245
Posted: May 25 2008 at 10:20pm | IP Logged Quote domchurch3

I'm thinking about next year's curriculum and where I'd like to go. For years before I was even needing to think that far ahead on the subject, I was sold on the Well-Trained Mind's chronological view of teaching history. Now, I'm not so sure that's the best route for us. I'm interested in knowing how those who don't follow a chronological order approach history studies. Do you study history in the context of whatever read-alouds you do or do you start off with plans to study certain periods in depth but allow for rabbit trails? The thought of chronological history was intriguing and it makes sense, but I found myself putting off reading books that I was yearning to share with my daughter simply because I thought, "No, I can't introduce the Little House Books until the 4th grade." Yes, I know, totally faulty thinking. I'm thinking that a Book of Centuries along with a timeline will help put each era were studying into perspective. I'm also thinking it might serve us more to spend more time on Geography than History this year. Has anyone put off History studies until after 1st grade?
Back to Top View domchurch3's Profile Search for other posts by domchurch3
 
folklaur
Forum All-Star
Forum All-Star


Joined: Feb 07 2005
Location: N/A
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2816
Posted: May 25 2008 at 10:48pm | IP Logged Quote folklaur

IMO....

a first grader doesn't need formal history. I mean, you can do general time periods, like study Egypt and make sugar cube pyramids and a pyramid out of a box and they can decorate the inside, and write their name in hieroglyphs....and you can touch on Middle Ages and make a castle and design a coat of arms and have a feast, etc...stuff like that for a 1st grader. Hands on stuff.

I have the Usborne First Encyclopedia of History - the first encyclopedia is totally geared to this age. I am using it as a springboard for my first grader (plus it is internet linked so there are more ideas online through the Usborne website for printable pages and other websites, etc) and reading books to go along with - like Magic Tree House and Magic School Bus and Good Times Travel Agency. And picture books. Lots of picture books.

Kids don't seem to need chronological history. I think it appeals to us Moms because it makes sense to us . Kids seem to do fine, especially if you have a timeline so they can "see" it.

I mean...a first grader is roughly 6 years old. How much do you really remember from your school work from when you were six?
Back to Top View folklaur's Profile Search for other posts by folklaur
 
JodieLyn
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: Sept 06 2006
Location: Oregon
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12234
Posted: May 25 2008 at 10:57pm | IP Logged Quote JodieLyn

We do 2 types of reading.. I have a list with books going chronologically and then whatever sounds good.

So we'd probably be starting with Bible stories (where else do you start history but with Creation? ) but then also reading different books that might be particularly interesting to the child.

The fun thing is that you connect the dots as you go.. so for instance.. we'd read some of the American Girl books about WWII and then read the Narnia books.. and we could connect the dots.. remember the war in Molly that made Emily come and stay with her. It was that SAME THING that made the kids have to go to the country in The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.

__________________
Jodie, wife to Dave
G-18, B-17, G-15, G-14, B-13, B-11, G-9, B-7, B-5, B-4

All men who have turned out worth anything have had the chief hand in their own education.
-Sir Walter Scott
Back to Top View JodieLyn's Profile Search for other posts by JodieLyn
 
domchurch3
Forum Pro
Forum Pro


Joined: July 12 2007
Location: Texas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 245
Posted: May 26 2008 at 6:13pm | IP Logged Quote domchurch3

cactus mouse wrote:
IMO....

I mean...a first grader is roughly 6 years old. How much do you really remember from your school work from when you were six?


Which is exactly my reason for wanting to put off a more formal emphasis for a later time. At the same time, I don't want her to miss out on the fun of sugarcube pyramids and so on, so I think what I'll do is just do some history from whatever it is were reading from our Read-Alouds and Scripture study. I'm doing a combination of Mater Amablis, Simply Charlotte Mason and Sonlight Read-Alouds. MA has 1st graders begin a 3 year study of US history and SCM rotates 6 modules, so a 1st grader would have a broad survey of all of history in 6 weeks increments. For some reason, that I can't pinpoint, neither of those options appeals to me.
Back to Top View domchurch3's Profile Search for other posts by domchurch3
 
K&Rs Mom
Forum Rookie
Forum Rookie


Joined: April 14 2008
Location: Michigan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 58
Posted: May 28 2008 at 2:24pm | IP Logged Quote K&Rs Mom

JodieLyn wrote:
We do 2 types of reading.. I have a list with books going chronologically and then whatever sounds good.


This is what we do too, for the same reason you mentioned - I found I was putting off a lot of stuff I wanted to do because it didn't fit into our time-focus. We're using the WTM plan for history, and some of the books recommended to go with that, but have other books at the same time. So my dc are reading about the ancients for school, but we just finished reading Heidi (late 1800s Switzerland) and started Thimble Summer (early 1900s America). Since we usually do our schoolwork in the morning, if they ask me to read in the afternoon we'll pick up our other book. They remember info out of both, and ask me questions randomly through the day that show they're processing both, so I guess it's working!


__________________
Aubrey
Mom to K (7.5yo) & R (5yo)
Back to Top View K&Rs Mom's Profile Search for other posts by K&Rs Mom Visit K&Rs Mom's Homepage
 
mom3aut1not
Forum All-Star
Forum All-Star
Avatar

Joined: May 21 2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 757
Posted: May 28 2008 at 3:43pm | IP Logged Quote mom3aut1not

Have you seen First Timeline from RC History? It would seem to be a nice framework for an easy history study.

In Christ,
Deborah
Back to Top View mom3aut1not's Profile Search for other posts by mom3aut1not
 
Sparrow
Forum Rookie
Forum Rookie
Avatar

Joined: April 28 2008
Location: Indiana
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 94
Posted: June 16 2008 at 10:35am | IP Logged Quote Sparrow

I picked up the story of the world vol. 1 off ebay, but we won't be doing a strict history curriculum. I really just want her to begin to have a general introduction to the major ancient civilizations (and I LOVE that stuff myself) and do some fun projects. We're going to do basic American history, too (we do 18th century historical re-enacting so it's not like it's a totally foreign thing to her). I'll be re-introducing all of this in more depth as the years go on, too, so I don't feel any pressure to make sure she knows it all by heart.

__________________
Katie, blessed wife to Tyson and mom to all girls! Bailey (7) Riley (3) and Rory (3/17)
Back to Top View Sparrow's Profile Search for other posts by Sparrow Visit Sparrow's Homepage
 
MarilynW
Forum All-Star
Forum All-Star


Joined: June 28 2006
Location: N/A
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4275
Posted: June 16 2008 at 11:54am | IP Logged Quote MarilynW

I have moved away from the WTM approach. My first graders did not find the Ancient History so interesting when we did it (they were just 6)

I think reading lots of living books and using a Book of Centuries/timeline book is good.

I use the timeline notebook and cds from Homeschool in the Woods - the little ones just color in pictures from the cd, the big ones color in and stick in the timeline notebooks. We print out saints etc from the internet to stick in the notebooks.

I can find a link to a printable pdf Book of Centuries if you are interested.

The website Reading Your Way Through History is a good source of books - also Sonlight, MODG, Emmanuel Books catalog etc

__________________
Marilyn
Blessed with 6 gifts from God



Back to Top View MarilynW's Profile Search for other posts by MarilynW
 
hopalenik
Forum Pro
Forum Pro


Joined: Nov 17 2006
Location: Connecticut
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 230
Posted: June 16 2008 at 12:13pm | IP Logged Quote hopalenik

It really depends on the child. My first who is 8 1/2 loves history. She can't read enough about different time periods-american, Egyptian, Greek, and the middle ages. But my twins who are 7, don't get it. So I quit. The oldest reads and reads. I am working on the continents with the twins in a Montessori like way. We are using a Montessori continent map and some animal printouts and some pictures of cultures and stuff. And I am reading through Setons American History Grade 1, as a read aloud because I realized that they had never picked up on who Abraham Lincoln was, etc. We started doing some History Pockets work with a Childs History of the World but the twins retained nothing. With the first we read through the first 2 volumes of STOw and she LOVED it, LOVED it, Loved it. With her reading I have let it be all over the place historically and at the moment I am just hardly reading at all because I have to regain control of reading time-the hearing impaired child makes reading out loud an excruciatingly painful event...

__________________
Holly
Mom to dd 10, twins dd and ds (transplant as baby that failed 05/09, permanent dialysis patient) 8 , dd 5 and dd 3 1/2 and dd in Feb 2009. 2 I hope to meet in heaven.
Back to Top View hopalenik's Profile Search for other posts by hopalenik
 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login
If you are not already registered you must first register

  [Add this topic to My Favorites] Post ReplyPost New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Hosting and Support provided by theNetSmith.com