| Author | |
happymama
Forum Pro
Joined: Feb 05 2007
Location: N/A
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 410
|
| Posted: Sept 02 2007 at 10:37pm | IP Logged
|
 |
|
My son will turn 5 in January and reads at a 3rd grade level and LOVES "learning".
We mostly do Montessori-based learning for now, but I do intend to eventually follow something like what's described in the Well Trained Mind. (but Catholic.) The Grammar STage of the Trivium traditionally runs grades 1-4, right? So my thought is to go ahead and begin "grade 1" in January and spend roughly 18 months on that work, and then another 18 months on "second grade" work. To me, this seems like a less stressful/demanding way to begin our schooling adventure. What do you think?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Rachel May
Forum All-Star
Joined: June 24 2005
Location: Kansas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2057
|
| Posted: Sept 03 2007 at 9:15am | IP Logged
|
|
|
In Laura Berquist's book "Designing Your Own Catholic Curriculum" she makes k-2 "Primary", 3-6 "Grammatical", 7-9 "Dialectical", and 10-12 "Rhetorical". The primary stage is mostly for gaining proficiency in memorization, math, and reading skills to be a firm foundation--along with faith formation--for future learning and fact acquisition. In the primary stage there are far fewer subjects (my understanding is that this is very different from "Well Trained Mind"), and they are ordered toward helping the child become proficient in those skills necessary for future learning.
We started our K when the boys were almost 5 and took about 14 months to finish it. It was a difficult year in general as I was a new homeschooler, my husband was deployed, I had baby #5, and we had lots of visitors, but the year was still a success. After that, we had no problem doing the planned coursework in about 10 months. I gave myself plenty of time to do what needed to be done along with gaps for field trips and rabbit trails and pausing when the kids hit a learning wall.
I'm not trying to discourage you, only to say you may complete what you plan more quickly than you expect, especially with a good reader. Mine were late readers.
__________________
Rachel
Thomas and Anthony (10), Maria (8), Charles (6), Cecilia (5), James (3), and Joseph (1)
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Willa
Forum All-Star
Joined: Jan 28 2005
Location: California
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3881
|
| Posted: Sept 03 2007 at 4:27pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
TWTM is a bit more strenuous in the early years than DYOCC's suggestions. So perhaps 3 years to complete 2 WTM years would be a good idea, especially since your child is so young. TWTM tends to be heavy on the seatwork.
If he is zipping through the work easily, all the more time to spend on just being a child -- on nature study and crafts projects and liturgical life and learning good habits that will serve him well later on in life.
I would work on making the history and science notebooking fun and enriching and full of rabbit trails at that age. TWTM suggests this, but in my experience as moderator of a classical education group, sometimes homeschool moms of bright youngsters let that part of it slip and start setting their goals on achievement, which sometimes leads to burnout for the child and mom.
It sounds to me like you are approaching it the right way !
__________________
AMDG
Willa
hsing boys ages 11, 14, almost 18 (+ 4 homeschool grads ages 20 to 27)
Take Up and Read
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
happymama
Forum Pro
Joined: Feb 05 2007
Location: N/A
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 410
|
| Posted: Sept 04 2007 at 1:47pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
"sometimes homeschool moms of bright youngsters let that part of it slip and start setting their goals on achievement"
Willa, thanks for this great reminder!!
Rachel, thanks for your explanation. I've been putting off reading DYOCC but perhaps I should.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Rachel May
Forum All-Star
Joined: June 24 2005
Location: Kansas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2057
|
| Posted: Sept 04 2007 at 2:27pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
happymama wrote:
| Rachel, thanks for your explanation. I've been putting off reading DYOCC but perhaps I should. |
|
|
Willa is really the brains here, but I thought my experience might be helpful. Don't be intimidated by the book. The meat for the beginner is only about 30 pages. The rest is a year by year course breakdown. I read the intro once a year to see if I still agree.  I haven't picked up WTM yet.
An interesting note, Michele Q was telling me that Laura Berquist is very influenced by Charlotte Mason (I heard Laura say something to this effect herself) so I have found her approach goes hand in hand with Real Learning.
I hope your adventure starts well. I remember calling a friend after my first day of homeschooling and telling her it was the worst day ever. Her response was, "Well, now you have that behind you." 
__________________
Rachel
Thomas and Anthony (10), Maria (8), Charles (6), Cecilia (5), James (3), and Joseph (1)
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
nissag
Forum All-Star
Joined: Nov 23 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1511
|
| Posted: Sept 15 2007 at 7:35pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Laura Berquist's book is very concise. I recommend it highly for new classical homeschoolers. My husband read through it extremely quickly and came away with an excellent working knowledge of the concept. I think her books lists are fairly good as well, though of course, it's easy to customize to your needs.
I can surely see the CM influence in LB's approach. The two philosophies are entirely compatible.
__________________
Nissa
Deacon's wife, mother of eleven, farmer, teacher, creator, cook.
At Home With the Gadbois Family
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Trivium Academy
Forum Newbie
Joined: Feb 06 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Feb 13 2008 at 2:49pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
As a WTM user for first and second grade, I recommend looking to your child to see what they need instead of just following the WTM (or any other guide) blindly.
WTM recommends curricula that might not fit your child or your goals. If value Charlotte Mason's teachings/techniques at all, you might not be happy with WTM suggestions in the long run. Take what you like from WTM and make it your own.
We've adopted Tapestry of Grace, dropped Spelling Workout until 3rd when we'll start Simply Spelling by Laurie Hicks, dropped First Language Lessons by Jessie Wise and changed to Primary Language Lessons by Lingua Mater/Hillside Education.
I know could have done much worse that what we did but I have made missteps with my dd7 using the WTM blindly for first grade. I should have just focused on Bible/character education, phonics instruction, reading & narration, handwriting, and math as our core subjects and used history, science and other subjects as supplements.
I disagree with grammar and spelling curriculum in first grade. A child who cannot read fluently shouldn't have to learn to spell. Learning about nouns, verbs and punctuation can be done through copywork and informal discussion or even through picture books about grammar like A Mink, a Fink and a Skating Rink: What is a Noun?
Anyways, that's been my experience.
:) Jessica
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
|
|
4Real Forums : Philosophy of Education
Topic: 1st 2 years of a classical program
