| Author | |
dale45039
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 21 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 43
|
| Posted: April 09 2011 at 5:44am | IP Logged
|
 |
|
(Saturday of the Fourth Week in Lent)
PETER moves in and out of the scenes of Christ's trials with regularity. Recovering from his first panic at the arrest of Christ, from which he fled, he managed to recover enough of his bravado to follow Christ at a safe distance when the Saviour was taken to the home of Annas. Here he was content to remain outside until John used his influence to get a maid at the gate to permit Peter to enter the outer court. It was here that Peter first denied he was a follower of the Messias.
When Christ was led bound to the house of the high priest Caiphas, Peter followed, and managed to get a place near the glowing fire in the outer court where he was spotted as a stranger and again accused of being a disciple of Jesus of Nazareth. Again Peter denied this and did so with a very unconvincing reply couched in forceful language: "I do not know the man" (Mt. 26:72).
It was about an hour later now and Peter had returned from the gate, where he had gone after the second denial. He may have heard the shouts of the assembled Sanhedrin crying out in mock indignity that Christ was guilty of blasphemy and was worthy of death, for the sacred writer says that Simon Peter was standing warming himself (Jn. 18:25) when "one of the bystanders came up and said to Peter: 'Surely thou also art one of them, for even thy speech betrays thee.' Then he began to curse and to swear that he did not know the man" (Mt. 26:73, 74).
You will note that Peter made his three denials flatly and peremptorily. He made a triple denial and this indicates revolution. He made the denials not before one witness but before many, and so gave scandal, for no doubt there were some of the common people who maintained some reverence for the great wonder-worker Christ, and Peter's denial of his Lord and Master may have hardened them and the scandal may have prevented some of them from going forward to testify in Christ's favor.
It is worthy of note, too, that Peter remained in the outer courts of both Annas' and Caiphas' homes. He mingled with the servants and accepted their hospitality, shared the same fire, and sat with them. True, he did quit their company once and go to the gate but he quickly returned. Many persons step out of the midst of sin but hang about its courts. They themselves would not be outrageous sinners but retain a taste for sin. They may not openly commit sins against the Sixth Commandment but they harbor bad thoughts and desires and use impure language. They are not drunkards themselves, but they keep company with loose-livers and wild scatter-brained individuals and groups. Keep ever before you the picture of Peter denying his God. Peter was a great and forward disciple of Christ, full of zeal, who prayed, professed his great devotion to Christ, and who drew his sword in Christ's defense, but now behold him denying that same Christ before a few servants and soldiers. Great is the force of evil company to pervert even a godly mind. As the body is infected by pestilential air, so the soul is infected by the contagion of bad company.
Ask yourself today if your friends are all of a high type and beyond reproach. Do you always give your friends good example? Do you profess Christ to your friends or are you sometimes afraid to make the Sign of the Cross and say Grace before and after meals in their presence? Are you afraid to visit a church when you are with friends? Ask St. Peter today to pray for you that you may never deny God by word or deed.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
dale45039
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 21 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 43
|
| Posted: April 11 2011 at 6:03am | IP Logged
|
|
|
(Monday After Passion Sunday)
IT IS noteworthy that Holy Scripture records first, that Peter emphasized his third denial with curses and oaths; and second, that the cock crowed for the third time, at which instant it suddenly dawned on Peter that this was the very thing Christ had foretold; and third, that "the Lord turned and looked upon Peter and he remembered the word of the Lord, how He said: 'Before a cock crows, thou wilt deny me thrice,' and Peter went out and wept bitterly" (Lk. 22:61-62).
There is a powerful lesson to be drawn from the fact that Peter endeavored to strengthen his third denial by cursing and swearing. Peter had been and was a fisherman. Before being converted and called to the apostolate, he had been a man of strong language. The three years with the gentle Christ had weaned him away from that habit. He was certain, no doubt, that he had mastered control of his tongue and language. Certainly the companionship with Christ had done much, but it had not done all. The "old man" was still alive and the "new man" was weak, and so the battle ensued and the old habits were quick to return. From this, we may learn that the fact that we have not committed sins of habit for a long time does not mean that they are completely eradicated. We must ever be on the watch and pray that we may not fall into them in times of temptation or stress.
Next, note that it was not until the cock crowed thrice that Peter remembered the words of our Lord. It is hard to understand why Peter did not realize what was happening after he heard the crow of the rooster after the first denial. And why did Peter not remember Christ's prediction after the second denial? No, it took three denials and a heartbreaking glance from the gentle Saviour to touch Peter's heart, and to recall to mind the words of the Lord concerning Peter's vain boasting about fidelity.
Learn from this that sin deadens the heart to every voice and blinds the eye to sin. From your own experience perhaps you can recall occasions when you yourself were so attached to sin that the warnings of your parents, the stirring sermons of retreats and parish missions left you cold and unmoved.
It may well have been that the gentle Saviour looked tenderly at you too as He did at Peter. How wonderful is our God, who at a time when He Himself was about to be sentenced to the cruel death of the cross, thought of His poor weak Apostle, and forgot Himself and His own condition to cast a tender, merciful, understanding glance at His follower. "He spoke with His eye," says Erasmus. The power that went with that look struck Peter's heart. Without the calm sovereignty of that look, without its accompanying pitying kindness, Peter might well have followed in the footsteps of Judas.
Walk the Way of the Cross today and beg of the gentle Christ to let His sacred healing glance fall upon you as it fell upon Simon, the Cyrenian, St. Veronica, and the women who wept as He passed. Catch His eye as He falls under the cross and beg of Him to preserve you from despair.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
dale45039
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 21 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 43
|
| Posted: April 12 2011 at 5:32am | IP Logged
|
|
|
(Tuesday After Passion Sunday)
THE fact that Christ looked at Peter as the cock crowed for the third time is recorded only in St. Luke's Gospel, but Luke, Matthew, and Mark all record that "Peter went out and wept bitterly." That look of the Master cut Peter to the quick. As Moses' rod once struck the rock and water flowed, so the gentle glance of Christ caused Peter's heart to overflow. That heart was singularly touched, and the fear-frozen memories thawed into penitential tears.
Peter's conversion followed a fine pattern. First, you will notice that Peter went out — he left the place and persons who occasioned his shameful denial of our Lord. There can never be any true and lasting conversion until, and unless, we are determined to avoid the occasions of sin — that is, any person, place, or thing that may cause us to fall. We will notice, too, that when Peter took himself away from the evil company he was in, he was able to look at Christ and Christ at him. Whoever wants to cleave to God must sever himself from God's enemies. Avoid, therefore, evil companions.
Consider next that Peter's repentance was immediate. He did not put off his conversion and repentance. Many of us desire to avoid sin and be really converted but, like St. Augustine, say in folly "but not yet." We seem to put more than ordinary trust in becoming holy when our vices have forsaken us. We dwell too often on the easy conversion of the Good Thief, but as St. Augustine warns: "Christ pardoned one thief on the cross to show that such things are possible, but only one to show it to be very rare."
Let us ask ourselves why Peter wept. First, in his quiet moments he realized that he had denied his Lord. Have we not all at one time or another denied our Lord? If you have deliberately missed Mass; given scandal or bad example; resisted God's will or that of His Church — then take your place with Peter.
The second thing that brought Peter to penitential tears was the thought of the excellence of the Lord whom he had denied. Have you thought seriously of how much Christ has done for you, the graces He has merited for and showered upon you — the home, the health, the advantages He has provided for you?
Third, Peter remembered the position in which the Lord had placed him — converting, befriending, and calling him to His apostolate. Has Christ not placed us all in positions of honor and trust as Christians? Do we not call ourselves Christians, followers of Christ? Yet not only have we not always followed Christ, but we may well have led souls away from Christ by our bad example and sins.
Fourth, Peter recollected that he had been forewarned. Have we not sinned against the light and with full knowledge and full consent in grave matters? Oh, have we not all frequently resisted the Holy Ghost, our conscience, and the warnings of our parents, teachers, and the Church? Think about your wanderings, backslidings, and your small progress on the road to perfection!
Peter fell dreadfully, but by repentance rises sweetly. A look of love melts him into tears. Clement notes that Peter was so repentant that all his life after, when he heard a rooster crow, he would fall upon his knees, and weeping, would beg pardon for his sins. Beg of Peter to teach you the necessity and the way of true repentance.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
dale45039
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 21 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 43
|
| Posted: April 13 2011 at 6:01am | IP Logged
|
|
|
(Wednesday After Passion Sunday)
THE charge of blasphemy was hurled against Christ by Caiphas, and, after rending his garments — a ritualistic sign of finality —the high priest left the gathering of the Sanhedrin and the group dispersed leaving Christ to the sport of the soldiers. St. Luke puts it this way: "And the men who had him in custody began to mock him and beat him. And they blindfolded him and kept striking his face, and asking him, saying, Prophesy, who is it that struck thee?' And many other things they kept saying against him, reviling Him" (Lk. 22:63-65). St. Matthew adds that they "spat in his face and buffeted him" (Mt. 26:67).
There is hardly another scene in the whole terrible story of the Passion that compares with the one in which mere mortals taunted, mimicked, maltreated, and grossly insulted the veritable Son of God. No artist has ever tried to portray this vicious scene. We have paintings by famous artists of the flagellation, the crowning of thorns, and the crucifixion but none has dared to depict the scene wherein Christ was so basely treated in the home of the high priest Caiphas in the early hours of the morning following His arrest. Not one artist has dared portray men spitting into the adorable face of God. It shocks even one's imagination to conjure up such a picture.
The worst criminal would have been given time to rest before his arraignment before Roman authorities on the morrow. He would have been given "bread and water, but not Christ. Small comforts were denied Him. He was bound to a small pillar by iron chains and bound in such a position as not to be able to stand erect or fall to the hard floor. In His darkened hour in the garden of Olives an angel came to comfort Him, but here, He saw naught but the cruel soldiers mocking and reviling Him. Even His enemies were shut off from Him by the dirty cloth with which He was blindfolded. "Thou dost claim to be a Prophet," they shouted. "Well, tell us who is striking Thee." You say You are a king — well, You will be crowned a king tomorrow. All the time they reviled and mocked Him, the soldiers kept striking, kicking, and spitting into His face.
Who is it that endures such torments? It is Jesus Christ, the Son of God, at whose birth the angels sang: "Glory to God in the highest," the same one of whom God the Father said: "This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased" (Mt. 3:17). What has happened that He is so abandoned and so insulted? Let us say here and now that no one compelled Christ to undergo this torment. He offered Himself of His own free will to pay the ransom for your sins and mine. Ask yourself if there is or has ever been any one who has loved you enough to suffer thus for you? To whom then does your love belong? Christ bore the heavy chains to free us from the galling chains of our passions and sins. He bore a prison sentence that we might be freed from the eternal prison of hell. He endured the spitting in his face to repair for the awful insults men have offered, and do and will offer His eternal Father.
Go to your Christ in His new prison —the tabernacle — and beg pardon for the insults you have heaped on Him by your sins. If you condemn in your heart the foolish men who insulted our Lord during the Passion, think how much worse your insults are since the soldiers were pagans but you are a child of God and a follower of Christ.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
dale45039
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 21 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 43
|
| Posted: April 14 2011 at 5:11am | IP Logged
|
|
|
(Thursday After Passion Sunday)
THE soldiers, tired from making sport of the chained Christ took some rest, but the bruised, besmirched, disheveled, humiliated Saviour stood in the chill of the early dawn. As the sun was rising, the chief priests, the Scribes, and the whole Sanhedrin held a secret meeting. Strange, isn't it, how willing and easy men rise to do evil, while the doing of good seems so irksome? The sacred writers do not relate what took place at that meeting except to say that they "took counsel together against Jesus in order to put Him to death" (Mt. 27:1).
The secret meeting was soon concluded and a public session was instigated. Try to imagine the scene. See Christ in His deplorable state being dragged into the large meeting room. See Him meet every glance with a searching look. He was God, and, as God, knew what had transpired at the secret session and He could read, too, the hearts of His enemies. Why would they bother to go through the formalities of a second investigation, since, certainly, they were not searching for the truth. They had already taken "counsel together" against Him, "in order to put Him to death."
It was because Christ knew their thoughts that He said in reply to the question: "If thou art the Christ, tell us?" "If I tell you, you will not believe me; and if I question you, you will not answer me, or let me go. But henceforth, the Son of Man will be seated at the right hand of the power of God." And they all said: "Art thou, then, the Son of God?" He answered, "You yourselves say that I am"; and they said: "What further need have we of witness? For we have heard it ourselves from his own mouth" (Lk. 22:66-71). "And they bound him and led him away, and delivered him to Pontius Pilate the procurator" (Mt. 27:2).
When Caiphas put that loaded question directly to Christ: "Tell us, art thou the Christ?" Our Lord replied in kind. Remembering what abuse He had suffered when that question had been asked at the first meeting of the Sanhedrin a few hours earlier, our Lord said: "If I tell you, you will not believe me, and if I question you, you will not answer me, or let me go." Here the Master was clearly referring to the prophecies of the Old Testament regarding the Messias, which they, as scholars and teachers, were supposed to know well, and which, if they would only open their eyes, could see clearly were fulfilled and verified in Him. The high priest and the Sanhedrin had but one single thought and that was not the fulfillment of the prophecies but the destruction of Christ. The merciful Christ in an endeavor to impress His enemies with the salutary fear of the consequences of their unjust action, added as He did at His first trial — "you shall see the Son of Man sitting on the right hand of the power of God," alluding clearly to the final judgment of all men, where true justice would prevail.
How often have we not all heard the Ten Commandments, listened to sermons, read books, studied Christ's counsels and with our hearts set on sinning, closed our mind and conscience to the voice of God pleading with us to keep His law. How often may some of us have prayed half in earnest to know our vocation, to which prayer Christ could say in answer: "If I shall tell you, you will not believe me, and if I question you, you will not answer me"?
Will you not go to Christ in His tabernacle today, and appease His wounded heart for the indignities heaped upon Him before Caiphas and the Sanhedrin? Tell Him how ready you are to do His will in all things.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
dale45039
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 21 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 43
|
| Posted: April 15 2011 at 6:20am | IP Logged
|
|
|
(Friday After Passion Sunday)
THE farcical trials before the high priest were over. Christ had been found guilty of blasphemy because He said He was the Son of God. This, under the Jewish law was punishable by death, but since the sentence could not be carried out without the consent of the Romans, Christ would have to appear before Pontius Pilate who was the Roman governor or procurator at that time. When word of Christ's condemnation reached the unfortunate Judas, Scripture says: "he... repented and brought back the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and the elders, saying, 'I have sinned in betraying innocent blood.' But they said, 'What is that to us? See to it thyself.' And he flung the pieces of silver into the temple, and withdrew; and went away and hanged himself with a halter" (Mt. 27:3-5).
The story of Judas presents many reflections for each of us and not the least ought to be that there is always an awful difference when we look at sin before we do it and after we commit it. Before we commit sin, the thing to be gained seems so attractive and the transgression that gains it seems so trifling and insignificant. But, oh, after the sin is committed, the tables are turned and the thing gained seems so contemptible and the transgression so great. Thirty pieces of silver — pitch them into the temple and get rid of them. The thing that we win is cursed in our grasp. Take, for instance, something we know to be in violation of the commandments of God, tempted to it by a momentary indulgence of some mere animal impulse. How quickly it dies in its satisfaction. It lasts but such a short time and then we are left alone with the thought of the deed we have done. Most of our earthly aims are like that and certainly all of our transgressions follow that formula. As the silver Judas took to betray his God burned the palms of his hands until he cast them horn him like a viper that stung his hands, so does the devil ever cheat the sinner of the substance for a shadow, and then robs him of that, or changes it into a frightful specter from which he would escape if he could.
Learn, too, that we may possess great privileges, make great profession of faith, fill high office, and still have no real piety. Again learn that there is a tremendous poweT in a guilty conscience to inflict punishment. Finally, learn that remorse alone is fruitless, but, if it leads to repentance and confession of sin born of a sorrow for having offended God, we can hope to follow Peter's example rather than that of Judas.
Would to God Judas had sought out Mary, the Mother of Mercy as John had done. How differently this tragic story might have ended! Her counsels, her prayers, and intercession would doubtlessly have won him a strengthening of hope. This very day, say a prayer to Our Lady of Hope asking her to fill your soul with the virtue of hope so essential to keep us from ever being swallowed up in the awful sea of despair.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
dale45039
Forum Newbie
Joined: July 21 2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 43
|
| Posted: April 16 2011 at 6:47am | IP Logged
|
|
|
(Saturday After Passion Sunday)
"NOW Jesus stood before the procurator; and the procurator asked him, saying, 'Art thou the King of the Jews?' Jesus said to him, Thou sayest it' " (Mt. 27:11).
St. Matthew's words "Now Jesus stood before the procurator" are certainly soul stirring words, for they point up the fact that He who shall judge the nations, Himself stands before Pontius Pilate to be judged. Pilate has won a terrible pre-eminence among the sons of Adam, for every child is taught to say that the Son of God "suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried."
It would be an error to say that all those who had anything to do with the death of Christ were totally depraved. Certainly Pilate was not in this class. He was actually a reluctant agent. Pilate's sin was not so much that he failed to recognize the Messiasship of Christ, as rather that he condemned without evidence, that he acted against his own convictions, that he was influenced by the fear of man, that he had a sordid regard for place and power, which all led him to his condemnation of an innocent Man, and in so doing, he prostituted his office.
There is something of Pilate about all of us. Despite our avowals that we are followers of Christ — Christians— do we not all too frequently act against our convictions, and do we not fail to do the upright and noble thing because we fear the mob or because we have a servile love for human applause. Certainly we are other Pilates when we fear to say we are Catholics; when we are afraid to bow our head or tip our hat passing a church; when we are afraid to make the Sign of the Cross before our grace at meals; when we are afraid to refrain from eating between meals during Lent for fear of what others will think or say; when we are too timid to walk away from the person who insists on telling impure stories — these and a thousand other ways.
The sequel of Pilate's history is affecting and instructive. The thing he dreaded came to pass, for he lost the favor of the emperor and died a suicide.
There is another point in the story that calls for our studied attention. It was Pilate's question: "Art Thou the king of the Jews?"
Jesus did not look much like a king as He stood there, His hands bound, and a rope about His neck. Where was His power? Where was His throne, His crown, His scepter, His royal robes?
But to us today, how different does it all appear! Christ is throned, now, far above all principality and power, and might and dominion, as He sits at the right hand of His Father.
But what of Christ in the Holy Eucharist? He doesn't look much like a King in the tabernacles of our churches the world over. Before we place too much blame upon Pilate, let us look within our own souls and we shall doubtlessly discover that we, like Pilate, have somehow failed to realize the King of kings under the humble species of bread and wine.
Before we do another thing today, let us each make an act of faith in the Divine Presence of the King of kings in the Eucharist and beg that this faith be increased so that from today on, we shall never fail to visit Him daily —if even only for a moment. Beg, too, for the courage to follow always the dictates of our conscience, and never to compromise, no matter what the pressure, in matters of faith and morals.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
|
|
Forum Locked) 
4Real Forums : Domestic Church
Topic: Daily Lenten Reflections
